Board pack · page 2
Position and exposure.
The finding to act on
Oversight reads 18 points lower than the CEO believes, concentrated in two automations.
kn0w issues the Automation Report to a portfolio company's board: how much of the company is automated, what it costs and whether it works. The company commissions it. The CEO tables the board pack. Your director reads it.
Board pack · page 2
Position and exposure.
The finding to act on
Oversight reads 18 points lower than the CEO believes, concentrated in two automations.
For FinTech and HealthTech companies, 50 to 500 staff, in Australia and the United Kingdom.
Which of your companies are moving fast on AI and automation, and which are not.
The board pack answers it for one company at a time, from recorded sessions with the CEO and six function heads. Report 000142 is the example below. The company in it is fictional.
Report 000142 opens with four questions a board asks about AI and automation and answers each from the readings. The company is automating: Workflows 58 and Tools 71, both Systematic. What the board was told about Oversight did not match.
The report states the gap between the picture the company drew of itself and what its functions run. In Report 000142, Oversight was over-read by 18 points. It reads 34, Early-stage, the weakest of the six.
In Report 000142, A$747,000 of annual productivity is recoverable by closing the Oversight gaps the report identifies. It is an estimate in the company's currency, with its basis stated in the report.
Each is owned by a function and dated 30, 60 or 90 days from issue, with the condition that closes it. In Report 000142, the three actions carry A$188,000, A$309,000 and A$118,000 of the figure. The balance of A$132,000 is closed by no single action.
Report 000142 closes with four questions selected by fixed rule from its findings: one keyed to the weakest reading, two to the required actions and one to the direction of the gap. None is authored for the pack.
Workflows, Tools, Skills, Oversight, Spend and Outcomes, each from 0 to 100 with its band, and the rules that apply in the company's sector and country. From the first Quarterly Review the pack shows movement against these readings.
Board pack · page 5
Head of Operations · Day 30
Merchant onboarding KYC automation
Recoverable ~A$188,000 p.a.
Head of Risk · Day 60
Internal product-analytics LLM
Recoverable ~A$309,000 p.a.
Head of Risk · Day 90
Skills in Compliance & Risk and Finance
Recoverable ~A$118,000 p.a.
Every report uses the same six readings, the same fixed weights and the same 0 to 100 scale. The same answers under the same methodology version give the same reading.
At kn0w.co. kn0w asks nothing of a fund.
A$24,000 covers the report, three Quarterly Reviews and the Annual Report. A$24,000 at each anniversary, fixed at commission. The fee is fixed before any session and does not move with the findings.
The CEO takes the board pack to the board. kn0w issues nothing to a fund.